Round Table Questions
Round Table Session #1: Milky Way dust and atmosphere
Additional question for all five tables to consider: Are atmospheric transmission effects, atmospheric PSF effects, and the impact of Milky Way dust factorizable at the level needed for LSST science?
Table A1, Moderator - Michael Schneider, Scribe - Andrew Bradshaw
Question: How do variations in observing parameters (e.g., exposure time, airmass, atmospheric transmission -- especially in y band) provide an advantage for understanding and quantifying photometry, photo-zs, chromatic PSFs, other? What are the trade-offs between decreasing the range or deliberately increasing the “lever arm” for some parameters?
Table B1, Moderator - David Burke, Scribe - Patrick Ingraham (TBC)
Question: Same as Table A.
Table C1, Moderator - Jeff Newman, Scribe - Alex Abate
Question: How can we use observations -- e.g., stars, galaxies, quasars, far infrared data, other? -- to constrain variations in Milky Way reddening (both amplitude and wavelength dependence) on small and large angular scales?
Table D1, Moderator - Sam Schmidt, Scribe - Eddie Schlafly
Question: Same as Table C.
Table E1, Moderator - David Kirkby, Scribe - Gregory Green
Question: Same as Table C.
Round Table Session #2: CCDs; PSF corrections for physical effects
Table A2, Moderator - Andrei Nomerotski, Scribe - Chris Davis
Question: How can we use differences in temporal and spatial variability to discriminate between shape perturbations introduced by 1) the sensors, 2) the optics, and 3) the atmosphere? Are there other differences we can exploit?
Table B2, Moderator - Chris Walter, Scribe - Andres Plazas
Question: How can we use external data, such as HST images or laboratory measurements, to constrain shape systematics? What specific images or measurements are needed?
Table C2, Moderator - Mario Juric, Scribe - Daniel Gruen
Question: What are the trade-offs in correcting sensor effects -- such as brighter-fatter, edge effects, or tree rings -- at the pixel level or the catalog level?
Table D2, Moderator - Eric Gawiser, Scribe - Rachel Bean
Question: Which aspects of the survey strategy can be used to minimize and discriminate between different sources of systematics -- e.g., dithering? exposure time? other?
Table E2, Moderator - Debbie Bard, Scribe - Steve Kent
Question: Same as Table D.
Round Table Session #3: Tackling the unknowns
Table A3, Moderator - Tony Tyson, Scribe - Satoshi Miyazaki
Question: Which system and observing parameters should we vary during commissioning (beyond the ranges anticipated during normal survey operations) to characterize known foreground physical effects and discover new systematics?
Table B3, Moderator - Chuck Claver, Scribe - Michael Wood-Vasey
Question: Same as Table A.
Table C3, Moderator - Mike Jarvis, Scribe - Rachel Mandelbaum
Question: Applying “null tests” in cosmic shear analyses is one way to identify residual systematic uncertainties. Which existing or new null tests will be most relevant for the full LSST data sample? Will these null tests have the required statistical sensitivity for cosmic shear measurements with LSST? (How do they scale?) What do we do when we see a 3-sigma effect, say, in a null test?
Table D3, Moderator - Steve Ritz, Scribe - Srikar Srinath
Question: Due to the planned short exposure times, atmospheric turbulence dominates the spatial variability of the LSST PSF, especially at small angular scales. How do we determine an appropriate model for the atmosphere (how many layers?, what parameters?), and what information is or should be made available to constrain this model (MASS/DIMM, scintillation of guider images, wavefront sensors, ...)? What measurements are useful to obtain “statistically” for producing realistic simulations, and which are useful to obtain simultaneously with the survey to constrain PSF spatial variability in specific images?
Table E3, Moderator - Jim Bosch, Scribe - Will Dawson
Question: How can the variable seeing in the large number of LSST epochs be used to learn about the impacts of the atmosphere - e.g., for blended objects, inferring the PSF from galaxy images? Others?